I don't want to stop working in the middle of an important photography or video project just because my bank has issues with their card-processing software, my card has not enough funds, or it has expired. I have a piece of software that covers all my needs in terms of image manipulation. That's why I'm not a Creative Cloud subscriber. I'm happy with it, although I've paid lots of money to obtain it.

I barely use even 10 percent of the functionality it provides, and I don't need anything more. This was the time when I purchased a Photoshop CS6 perpetual license. If it works, the users will buy it and many will not think of upgrading to the next version unless they need something more. If software doesn't work well, nobody will buy it. It's like paying rent to use my kitchen utensils. Being a subscriber to something I use on a daily basis doesn't feel right to me. At that time, I was using Photoshop Elements, and it served me quite well for my photography projects. All Creative Suite products have been diligently put deeper into Adobe's website, so it was very hard to find them. I remember when the Creative Cloud subscription was first pushed to the public. You can use it as long as you pay for it continually. While being cheaper to use the new software as a subscription, at the end, it's not yours forever. With the introduction of Creative Cloud, there were many complaints against the subscription model. Well, Adobe says you can't do that anymore. We used to buy perpetual licenses for applications from the Creative Suite, which felt like you really owned something. Do you remember Adobe's Creative Suite or CS? Yes, it was that family of Adobe applications that served creatives well for quite a long time.

Adobe creative suite cost